Members of the Western Colorado Congress showed up wearing T-shirts with the message, “Go Slow on oil shale” to a hearing at Grand Junction City Hall on June 1, with US Senate Energy and Natural Resource Committee members: Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM); Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT); and Sen. Ken Salazar (D-CO).
The article further below appeared on Page 5 in Friday’s Post Independent.
PAGE 5!!!
The gas companies are already punching holes in the ground faster than we can spit, carving up the wilderness with new roads, tearing up existing roads, polluting our air and water. AND NOW the oil companies want to dig up the Rockies for oil shale – a process that will forever change life in this valley. But that’s just a big ol Page 5 yawn to the local paper.
Go slow? This is just nuts. Abso-smurf-ly insane!
There. I said it. Somebody has to.
Senators hear committee’s suggestion on easing into oil shale development
by Donna Gray
GRAND JUNCTION - The message Thursday to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee was “bring on oil shale, but not too quickly.”
Senators Ken Salazar (D-Colo.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Pete Domenici (D-N.M.) held a committee field hearing in Grand Junction and got the message loud and clear that while oil shale can help the country achieve energy independence, research on new extraction technologies should be allowed to proceed slowly until they’re fully tested.
However, the Energy Policy Act passed in August 2005, mandates the Bureau of Land Management to offer public land for commercial leasing by the summer of 2007.
Elected officials from Rio Blanco and Mesa counties, both rich in oil shale resources and which will feel the strongest effects of development, were “cautiously optimistic” about oil shale’s future.
Mesa County Commissioner Craig Meis urged the senators to also explore other areas of the country that have potential energy resources.
“The energy crisis is too big for one area of the country to bear the whole burden,” he said. Nor does northwestern Colorado want to be a “sacrifice zone” for energy development.
No members of the Garfield County Commission spoke as witnesses at the hearing. Commission chairman John Martin was present in the audience and said the three county commissioners were not invited to speak at the hearing …
Even though the Garfield County Commissioners were not invited to speak at the hearing, County Commissioner Tresi Haupt headed up a coalition of local mayors and town officials from Garfield County and they presented this letter:
Dear Senator Pete Domenici, Senator Ken Salazar, and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee:
We, Northwestern Colorado elected officials, want to sincerely thank-you for coming to the Western Slope of Colorado to discuss the issues that local communities have concerning the Federal oil shale program. Unfortunately, many of us will not be able to attend in person. We have drafted this letter to give you a sense of the common concerns of many of the elected officials in Northwestern Colorado. We do hope this is the beginning of a long and thorough dialogue.
The Bureau of Land Management’s oil shale Research and Development Demonstration program is an important first step towards determining the potential for developing oil shale commercially. There are some basic questions that we simply cannot answer without the R&D program.
1) Is there a method to extract oil shale that is commercially viable?
2) Are there new technologies (such as the in-situ process) that can bring shale oil to market without the many environmental impacts associated with mining and retort?
3) What is the maximum amount of oil shale production that can be allowed before air quality, water quality and quantity, social impacts and our infrastructure meet their limits?
These questions should be answered before public land is leased for commercial oil shale production.
The local Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has stated that the 2005 Energy Policy Act requires commercial leasing of our public lands at the conclusion of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement scheduled for completion by February 8, 2007. That is not how we read the Act. The Act states (at § 15927(e)) that following adoption of final regulations, the Interior Department must consult with the Governors of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, representatives of local governments, interested Indian Tribes, and the public to determine the level of support in the development of oil shale and tar sands resources. If “sufficient support and interest” is found in a state, then the Department may conduct a lease sale. We believe that commercial leasing should not occur until the success of the Research and Development Demonstration program has been measured.
Additionally, we believe it is a mistake to direct the BLM to complete the oil shale Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement before the Research and Development Demonstration program is complete. Because of the timeline placed on the completion of the oil shale PEIS, the BLM has been placed in the impossible position of having to estimate the environmental effects of technology still being developed. This analysis also must consider all the possible social and economic effects of oil shale development for a large part of Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. This analysis would better serve the region if conducted in tandem with the R&D Demonstration program.
The R&D demonstration program should be allowed to run its course before commercial leasing of public land is allowed. There are thousands of acres that are privately owned by oil and gas industry that can and will be developed for oil shale if a feasible technology is discovered. Our public lands provide many of our communities with our most important and sustainable industry – hunting and tourism. We believe that the Federal government has the responsibility to answer our very basic questions before allowing wholesale leasing of our public lands.
When oil shale is mentioned on the Western Slope of Colorado it is discussed as an industry that brought our economy and communities to their knees. In the earliest part of the boom lack of housing and infrastructure had communities reeling and left people sleeping under bridges and in tent cities. Then, just as towns and counties were able to provide the needed infrastructure for the industry we experienced the bust. May 2, 1982, the day Exxon closed down its oil shale operations and sent home over 2,000 workers, is still referred to as “Black Sunday” in our communities. Local governments had created housing and infrastructure that was no longer needed. People walked away from their homes and mortgages. There was even a bank closing by FDIC. These are not the experiences of past generations. This is the experience of community leaders and people who hold elected office today.
Colorado is already playing a large role in supplying energy to meet the needs of our country. Western Colorado is a national leader in natural gas production. But this boom has certainly created its own problems. Housing is at critical levels and worker’s “man-camps” are being set up. Many of our communities are stretching to meet current needs.
Imposing the additional environmental and social impacts of oil shale development should only be done in a slow, systematic manner such that the needs of our communities are fully met. We hope that you will not allow mistakes of the recent past to be repeated. We urge you to not rush into oil shale leasing until more is known about the technology and the impacts a new oil shale industry will bring to our state.
Sincerely,
Tresi Houpt
Garfield County Commissioner
Keith Lambert
Mayor of Rifle, CO
Mick Ireland,
Chair, Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
on behalf of the entire BOCC
Michael Hassig
Mayor, Town of Carbondale
Scott Chaplin
Trustee, Town of Carbondale
Alice Hubbard-Laird
Trustee, Town of Carbondale
J. Russell Criswell
Trustee, Town of Carbondale
Townsend H. Anderson
City Councilor, Steamboat Springs
Ken Brenner
City Councilor, Steamboat Springs
Tod Tibbetts
Mayor Pro-tem, Silt
Dr. Teresa Coons
City Councilwoman, Grand Junction
Frank Breslin
Mayor, New Castle
Bruce Christensen
Mayor, Glenwood Springs
Doug Edwards
Mayor, Palisade
James R. Bennett
Trustee, Palisade
Judy Beasley
Trustee, Parachute
The letter describes Black Sunday in a nutshell. But that whole boom-bust economic disaster pales in comparison to the environmental disaster if oil shale actually happens.
The most important point of the letter is that the technology to develop oil shale does not yet exist and will still not exist when leasing begins in February 2007. Therefore we have no time to implement the Research and Development Demonstration Program before public lands are handed over to the oil companies. Local leaders are begging for more time.
The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel covered the hearing as Page 1 headline news. I’m not sure how long the link will last since they don’t archive their news stories.
Senators plumb oil shale potential in effort to solve U.S. energy crisis
By Gary Harmon
Squeezing oil from the shales of the North American West “could literally shake the world,” the chairman of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee said Thursday.
Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., said oil shale offers the hope of deceased dependence on imported fuels, especially from unreliable and threatening sources such as the Middle East, during a field hearing at Grand Junction City Hall.
Domenici, Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, stressed the need for the United States to develop its oil shale resources as a part of its efforts to gain energy independence.
The prospect of up to 1.8 trillion barrels of oil buried in the Green River Formation of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming “is indeed tantalizing to all of us,” Salazar told about 150 people packed into the City Hall auditorium, while as many as 100 more in a nearby room watched the hearing on television …
The greed – like oil – just oozes through the article. Except for Mesa County Commissioner Craig Meis, who blasted the Senators for what they are about to sacrifice at the altar of Big Oil.
‘We will not be a national sacrifice zone,’ Meis says
By Sally Spaulding
Northwestern Colorado plays a key role in supplying natural resources for the nation, but that’s no reason to make the area a national sacrifice zone, Mesa County Commissioner Craig Meis told members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee at a field hearing on oil shale in Grand Junction.
Meis encouraged coastal states to put forth their own contributions to the nation’s hunger for energy, adding that visitors to Colorado, like visitors to Florida and California, don’t take trips to see oil rigs.
Last month, representatives from Florida and California joined to defeat a House measure that would have allowed more drilling in federal waters starting three miles off the coast. Representatives argued the drilling would harm beaches and tourism.
Meis said Thursday that oil shale, in combination with the already staggering amounts of existing natural gas drilling in Colorado, could be too much for the state, which is also home to a thriving tourism industry.
“The needs of our country are too big for one portion of the country to provide,” Meis said. “We will not be a national sacrifice zone” …
Okay. Just to review, here are some fun facts about oil shale development:
• The Shell Exploration and Research Company’s Mahogany Project facility northwest of Rifle is at least 4 years away from developing any commercial potential from oil shale. “Despite all the attempts to develop a shale oil industry in the US over the past 100 years, the fact remains that no proven method exists for efficiently removing the oil from the rock,” said Bob Loucks, former manager of Shell’s Piceance Basin shale oil project and author of “Shale Oil: Tapping the Treasure”.
• Nonetheless, the US government plans to lease public lands to Shell in February 2007 anyway, for R&D.
• Stephen Mut, CEO of Unconventional Resources, a division of Shell, guesses it would take 2-3 barrels of water to create one barrel of oil during Shell’s patented in-ground process.
• According to CO River Water Conservation District External Affairs Director Chris Teese, new water storage facilities take at least 20 years to complete: “We don’t have much storage room in the reservoirs we have now. And we didn’t build any new projects during the last boom either.”
• The 2005 RAND Study estimated that Shell’s oil shale plant would require construction of a $3 billion power plant (the largest in CO history), and would consume 5 million tons of coal each year and the greenhouse gasses that go with it.
• Finally, officials in Garfield, Mesa, and Rio Blanco counties are already struggling with the burdens of the current natural gas boom. The affordable housing shortage is so bad workers’ “man camps” are being constructed to house employees. Companies can’t find enough qualified workers to fill vital positions.
When you stop and think about it, there are so many reasons NOT to go down the road to oil shale development. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Oil shale development is insane.
After living with the gas well drilling insanity for the past 5 years, watching clean air and water protections abandoned, seeing the wilderness fill up with gas rigs and trucks, and our town filling up with workers who don’t give a damn about Silt because they either go home on weekends or on to the next job, I’ve reached my Superman moment. Local individuals, local officials, legislators, congressmen, have all tried their damnedest to slow down this madness, with little to no success. So what makes us think oil shale development will be any different?
This is a job for Superman. That’s right. Only Superman can stop the government from leasing public lands to Shell for oil shale development.
Where are you, Superman?
Click here to add From the Styx to your RSS reader.